It is not an exaggeration to claim that the vast majority of modern online applications are developed using only front-end code. Our discussion now turns to micro frontends, a hotly contested issue in the programming community. Arguments continue to boil, frequently driven by fallacies about the efficacy of this method, about whether or not they are worth the hype and whether or not it is a smart practice to divide up your application into smaller fragments. Nonetheless, it’s impossible to ignore the reality that micro frontends are rapidly gaining traction and adoption.
The ever-changing nature of websites and their apps is a major factor. It is imperative that methodologies and frameworks for creating software evolve alongside these shifts. Only by allowing for many front-end frameworks to coexist would this be possible. As a result, micro front-ends are becoming increasingly important. Let’s take a deeper look at micro frontends and what introducing microservice to front-end development may entail for your web apps if you’re still on the fence regarding the necessity to adopt these in your development processes:
What is Micro Frontend?
By applying the principles of microservices to the front-end development of web applications, we get the term “micro frontend.”
Building feature-rich apps on top of a microservices architecture was the norm until recently. Frontend Monolith was the term for the resulting suite of apps. The main problem with this strategy was that the architecture eventually ended up being embedded in the program itself. Due to its independent development, routine upkeep has been difficult.
That’s why the creators of Micro Frontend came up with their solution. The methodology relies on the idea that functionality for a web app may be built separately by multiple groups and then combined to form a unified user experience.
Using the Micro Frontend Architecture, several teams may work together to build a product from top to bottom, from the database to the user interface. The final application is less bulky and a lot more pleasant.
The application has been segmented throughout the stack into distinct parts that cater to certain business functions. Therefore, thanks to Microservices design, front-end developers may take use of the same speed and adaptability as back-end teams.
What makes Micro Front Ends Different?
Connecting services in the back end via an SPA implies that one team cannot function independently of the other, even though there are different teams responsible for each service. It would imply each team having to be conscious of the other teams’ growth initiatives.
If, for instance, the SPA is integrated with a shopping cart service that allows users to add and remove items, as well as a recommendation system and a listing of the cart’s contents, any changes to the shopping cart service would necessitate a review of how the other services interact with it (Has it caused any errors? Is the user experience different now? If, however, these three components were individually connected to their own micro front end, they would no longer be interdependent. Teams may manage their own microservices and front ends independently. It allows for a structure that is both more autonomous and simplified.
What can Micro Front Ends do for Your Business?
- Scale Your Product: With micro frontends, it is simple to scale goods, especially when adding new features or increasing current ones. It’s lot easier to add additional services and to integrate them into your architecture when you can focus on only the one you need at a time, along with its micro frontend.
- Conversion Times Cut in Half: With fewer dependencies, we can speed up the process of expanding the product we discussed.
- You may now individually deploy any new feature or service you want to introduce. Separate testing, simple rollout/removal of pilot features (experimentation), a greater emphasis on the business side of user contact, etc. might all be advantages of this approach.
- Better Stability: Even while adjusting features and settings for a specific service or introducing new services, you can still ensure excellent performance to your application’s stakeholders.
- Managing Codebases and Repositories: With the ability to delegate responsibility for various features to different teams, you’ll have a much easier time keeping the documentation, codebases, repositories, etc., for all of your services in one place. Future technical resources will find this extremely helpful for referencing technical information, cleaning up code, refactoring, etc.
- Acquiring Skilled Professionals and Developers Is Simple: It becomes much simpler to bring on new staff members, cutting down on training time. Without the need to teach them for interdependent issues, they may be immediately included into the team working on the technologies and services in which they excel.
Why you should choose a micro-interface architecture?
Here are five reasons why you should choose a micro-interface architecture when creating process-based software.
1. Micro-interfaces is the consistency with which modifications may be implemented.
A logical progression of microservices, micro-interfaces strive to reduce the size and visibility of monoliths to allow for more upgrade flexibility.
When it comes to making changes to the back-end features, microservices development has greatly increased the flexibility. Nonetheless, the massive interface is still a problem for some. Here, micro-interfaces prove to be extraordinarily helpful.
When compared to microservices, micro-interfaces allow developers to create applications out of smaller, independently working parts, from the database all the way down to the HTML.
Businesses may save time and effort while creating user-centric, process-oriented apps by making use of micro-interfaces. This is because micro-interfaces enable the decomposition of complex workflow systems into manageable subsystems that facilitate the development, revision, and deployment of dynamic business procedures. This has the potential to enhance both the quality of service provided to customers and the effectiveness of business process management.
What this means for businesses is that they may more easily and safely alter the UX connected to the rules or procedures of their business unit, without causing any unintended consequences in other areas. As a result, we can update more frequently with less effort and expense.
2. The micro frontend makes user experience more accessible.
Today’s development team may view UX as a burden at times. Having a single point of failure for all UX design and implementation is problematic in the world of continuous software development and deployment. In contrast to how microservices democratized backend development, micro-interfaces made it possible for this service-oriented mindset to permeate every aspect of software creation.
When the front-end monolith is separated from the rest of the application, businesses may more completely adopt a microservices-like concept that will help them survive in the long run. By supplying both an interface and a back end, this method empowers cross-functional teams to operate independently. These teams are vertical, meaning they are dedicated to the end-to-end development of a single use case or feature rather than offering a wide range of services.
When internal and external developers are able to communicate more effectively, bottlenecks are lessened.
In a financial institution, for instance, the onboarding process for new customers might be split amongst several departments. By establishing a profile and a set of preferences for each client, one team may establish a streamlined process for creating accounts and maintaining them. Although some of these responsibilities can be handled automatically, others will be delegated to workers at different points in the process and recorded after they are finished.
The Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures of a connection may fall under the purview of a different group; these procedures may necessitate accessing third-party services in order to confirm the accuracy of the information the customer has provided and to meet regulatory requirements for due diligence. Teams may be given the authority to develop features for additional types of client onboarding.
Thanks to the flexibility provided by micro-interfaces, these groups may move at their own pace, based on the ideas they have and their capacity to put them into action, rather than being slowed down by bureaucratic red tape. Better case management and BPA may be achieved by optimizing every part of the process.
3. The codebase for a micro front-end app is more manageable and compact.
In general, the micro front end should use a more compact codebase than the front end monolith. Such compartmentalized code is typically simpler to understand, and developers are less likely to make mistakes owing to complexity.
Aside from enhancing precision, developers may typically process their code more quickly and with less effort. This is crucial for creating process-driven applications, the creation of which sometimes involves intricate procedures.
4. Micro front end promotes reusability throughout process and case management
Companies developing several apps that have certain similar process demands might benefit greatly from using micro frontends. Businesses may use the architecture’s case management features to quickly identify and eliminate duplicate steps when developing new procedures.
If your organization has many sites that need a payment processing workflow and the other automated business processes it triggers, for instance, you may reuse that functionality throughout your application rather than developing it from new on each site.
By just having to design and create front-end features once and then reusing them in numerous contexts, businesses may save a substantial amount of time and money over the long run.
5. With micro frontends, you can easily create unique perspectives on processes related to each individual’s duties.
To ensure that each persona in a workflow only sees relevant information for their job at the present stage of the workflow, it is important to give roles and privileges while creating process-driven applications. matters a lot. A more simplified and effective user experience is the result. Because of the micro, the front end of a business can be customized to fit the needs of each individual employee, and developers can have a better understanding of each function much more rapidly.
There may be an increase in development time if micro front-end components must be developed so that they may be set and combined into pages utilizing common executable tasks and statuses (Open, In Progress, Approved, etc.).
Instead of creating a separate, one-page app for each user role, the micro frontend design facilitates rapid iteration for role-specific modifications. It’s simple to adapt these reusable components to evolving user expectations and organizational norms.
Saffrontech allows you to create workflow-focused software.
We support legislation that is designed to divide and conquer. The developer’s workload is reduced even for the largest tasks by being automatically divided and segmented based on key performance indicators and outcomes. Front-end development which was formerly a monolith is now broken down into smaller, more manageable pieces, all of which are backed by solid technological integration. We present to you the future of app development: one that is simplified, productive, and efficient.